EazyMark uses AI to draft marks and feedback from your exam board’s mark scheme. Students can submit handwritten or typed work. Teachers review, edit and approve everything before students see it.
Students photograph handwritten work or type their answer directly. For handwritten work, they check the transcription before marking begins.
EazyMark uses your mark scheme to draft a mark and clear feedback, supported by quotes from the student’s own work.
Check every mark, edit the feedback and release it when ready. Students see nothing until a teacher approves it.
EazyMark gives every teacher the same starting point while leaving every mark and comment open to review.
Marks and feedback are prepared before review, so teachers do not start from a blank page.
The same criteria are used across the class, with every suggested mark still editable.
Draft feedback points to quotes from the student’s answer, making each suggested mark easier to verify.
Potential concerns are paused and sent to authorised staff before marking continues.
Every review, edit and release is recorded, giving your department a clear audit trail.
EazyMark cannot release marks or feedback on its own. A teacher reviews the work, changes anything needed and decides when it is ready for the student.
Each draft shows the student’s words beside EazyMark’s reasoning, so the teacher can check the evidence before approving the mark.
“like a poisoned chalice”
This image links Macbeth’s ambition to its harmful consequences and supports the suggested AO2 mark.
Request a short demo to see the marking workflow and discuss your department’s needs.