EazyMark drafts marking against your exam board's assessment objectives — with evidence quoted from each student's own writing. You review, adjust and release every mark. Nothing reaches a student unchecked.
Designed around how marking actually happens — handwritten mocks, typed homework, and a teacher who stays in charge of the result.
Photograph handwritten work or type directly. Students confirm the transcription of their own writing before anything is marked.
A mark for each assessment objective, with the reasoning and an exact quote from the student's own answer as evidence — matched to your exam board's mark scheme, never a generic one.
Accept or change any mark, edit the feedback, then release. Students see clear next steps in plain language — approved by you.
Everything a head of department needs to run consistent marking across a team — and everything a DPO needs to say yes.
Every AO mark carries reasoning and an exact quote from the student's own writing — so feedback is checkable, not vague.
One rubric, one standard. Draft marking applies the same criteria to the whole class set — your moderation starts from a level field.
Concerning content in a student's writing is flagged to the right staff before marking proceeds — quietly and auditably.
Photographed exercise books, scanned mocks or typed answers — one pipeline, with students confirming their transcription.
"What went well" and "even better if" written in plain language to the student, with the next step for each assessment objective.
EazyMark is marking support, not a marking replacement. It drafts; you decide. That's not a disclaimer — it's the design.
“The simile ‘like a poisoned chalice’ shows the student linking imagery to consequence — secure AO2 at this level.”
EazyMark